1. Verify
Read the summary and the evidence supporting each finding.
The PDF is designed for action, not SEO study. Learn how to verify evidence, choose work and avoid conclusions the data cannot support.
Read the summary and the evidence supporting each finding.
Cross impact with effort instead of trying to fix everything.
Turn the implementation guidance into a task, publish and measure again.
Part 1
It uses reproducible rules across technical health, on-page coverage, content depth, images, schema, mobile performance and AI-search crawler access. AI opinions do not determine the number.
Use it to compare the website against itself after changes, not against another tool with a different formula.
Part 2
The score summarizes. Evidence explains. Choose a dimension to understand its coverage.
These checks cover the public foundation required to discover and retrieve pages.
Part 3
Impact estimates potential value. Effort estimates work. A high-impact, low-effort item is usually the best starting point.
It affects a meaningful visibility, experience or conversion foundation. High impact can still be low effort.
Choose one or two high-impact items for this week.
Part 4
Your report includes up to five priorities to avoid producing a long checklist nobody implements.
What is happening
Eight of 20 reviewed pages do not provide a search description.
Why it matters
Specific descriptions can make results clearer and improve qualified clicks.
Write a unique, specific and concise description with the service, market and a concrete value proposition. The report lists the verified URLs.
View the source and confirm a unique, specific description that accurately summarizes the page. Google may show a different snippet depending on the query.
CTR of the corrected URLs in Search Console → Performance, over the next 2-4 weeks. Directional signal, not causal proof.
Every recommendation includes a check to confirm the change was applied. When a meaningful leading indicator exists, the report states what to monitor and for how long without promising a ranking lift.
Reference: Google’s guidance on snippets and useful meta descriptions.
Part 5 · optional
Add up to two competitors. Clariola reviews up to 15 pages per domain and compares website signals — not business results.
Your site
72/100
40% missing meta
Competitor A
84/100
7% missing meta
Competitor B
67/100
33% missing meta
The comparison does not measure rankings, backlinks, traffic, leads, revenue or market share.
Part 6 · GEO / AEO
No switch can guarantee a citation. The report checks conditions that can make useful content easier to retrieve and reference.
Distinguishes search access from training preferences. Blocking training is not automatically an SEO error.
Reports whether this emerging optional file exists. It does not replace robots.txt, sitemap or useful content.
Looks for structured types that match the business and content, such as LocalBusiness or FAQPage.
Detects clear questions and content signals such as experience, proof, comparisons and calls to action.
We measure sections between H1-H6 and flag pages without focused 100-150 word sections. The benchmark comes from third-party Google AI Mode research; it is a structural heuristic, not a ranking or citation guarantee.
We flag Schema.org features Google retired between 2023 and 2026 (HowTo, FAQPage rich results, CourseInfo, EstimatedSalary, VehicleListing, Practice Problem) through real JSON-LD structural detection, not only by @type.
We detect Google Translate, Weglot, TranslatePress and similar auto-translation widgets, plus mixed html lang across pages of the same site. The widget alone does not prove low quality; it flags URLs worth checking. Google's Quality Rater Guidelines treat unreviewed machine translation as a quality risk, not a direct ranking factor.
Tests discovery questions based on industry and market, then counts brand and competitor mentions.
The probe is an orientative snapshot, not a ranking or exhaustive share-of-voice measurement.
Sources: Google AI Mode research, Google’s rich-result changes, and Google’s explanation of the Quality Rater Guidelines.
Part 7
The report separates terms already communicated from new opportunities and maps each one to intent, priority and a page.
City: Miami, FL
Services are combined with the city when local intent exists, and local-business signals are reviewed.
Not keyword-tool data: Clariola does not report search volume, difficulty or ranking. Priority reflects intent, niche relevance and website evidence.
Part 8 · execution
Start with high-impact, low-effort work, then commercial content and refinements.
0 of 5
What you receive
What it does not claim
The audit does not access Analytics, Search Console or Google Business Profile. It does not measure backlinks, traffic, sales, rankings or real search volume.
Review all six views, or start an audit with your own domain, industry, market and competitors.
We use analytics and ad cookies from TikTok and Google to measure campaigns. Nothing loads until you decide. Privacy policy.